Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 day ago
A 200-pound pot-bellied pig escapes its enclosure and wanders into a neighbor's fenced yard, where a prized show dog allegedly suffers an injury. But Judge Judy wants more than accusations before deciding who's responsible.

In this unusual Judge Judy case, the judge explains the legal standard of preponderance of the evidence and why civil cases don't require proof beyond a reasonable doubt. She also questions the pig owner's responsibility for maintaining a secure enclosure and preventing the animal from roaming onto neighboring property.

Watch Judge Judy for more memorable courtroom disputes and no-nonsense lessons in the law.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:00You just witnessed that video? Who's the animal control officer? Are you the animal control?
00:03Did you witness the video before today? Yes, ma'am. You didn't see what I saw?
00:07I was not 100% sure that there was an actual bite. You don't have to be 100% sure.
00:12You have to be here in a preponderance of the evidence. I saw the pig. The pig was on her
00:17property. It had been on her property before, right? Yes, ma'am. Okay. That's a no-no, right?
00:23She fences in her property. Stand up. She fences in her property because she has dogs. She has an
00:28electric fence. Her dogs have collars. What you're supposed to do, if a tree is down in January
00:33and you have a 200-pound pet on your property, you fix the fence before February 20th. Doesn't
00:39that sound logical to you? Yes, ma'am. Great.

Recommended